Stirling Moss was commentating at the Watkins Glen GP years ago. He
described being pulled over the day before by a NY State Trooper while
"enthusiastically" motoring along the winding upstate NY roads in a borrowed
Mini Cooper S (the original one). The cop walked up the window and asked,
"Who the hell do you think YOU are, Stirling Moss?" After a bit of humorous
confusion over his driver's license, the cop was pretty nice until they got
into a heated debate about the relative safety of the Mini versus the cop's
Police Cruiser. The incident ended with Moss getting a ticket. True story.
Having had a Mini in the 70's, I would rather be driving one of those than
any SUV anytime. The ability to AVOID the accident in the first place is
always better than just surviving one.
--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Peter Duniho wrote:
"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
. ..
A factor that cannot be determined is how many accidents are avoided by
smaller vehicles due to their greater maneuverability.
Many factors are difficult or impossible to determine using current
statistical data gathering.
However, as in aviation, driver error is fundamentally the root cause of
most accidents. I find it amusing to see so many people (not just in
this newsgroup either) argue about which vehicle is "safer" when first of
all they haven't even agreed on what "safer" means, but more importantly
when most of those drivers need a "safer" vehicle because they and
everyone else on the road refuse to drive safely in the first place.
Yes, it is unfortunate that to the auto crowd, especially folks in
government or the IIHS, that "safety" is defined as "crash worthiness"
rather than "capable of crash avoidance."
Matt
|