"Jay Beckman" wrote in message
news:MS15f.77802$lq6.12852@fed1read01...
[...]
I think that if the powers that be see a significant volume of comments
opposing the proposed rule, they're gonna probably (I hope) notice.

One need only look at the outcome of other recent FAA NPRM, in which
thousands of "against" comments were provided without changing the direction
of the rule-making, to udnerstand that commenting on this NPRM isn't going
to have an effect either.

Face it: at this point in the game, with the NPRM already written and
published, the rule is as good as made. Whichever FAA bureaucrats put this
whole thing together, there's no way they're going to admit it's a mistake.

Frankly, if anything, restricted airspace gives those FAA bureaucrats a
reason for being. It's the same reason ALL of our supposed "security
improvements" have been made: for some bizarre reason, the general public is
trusting those who get paid to create security to tell us how much security
we need.

Pete