IFR/Flight Following -- ATC Preferences?
Tortuous reasoning. I may have to recline with a cold compress on my
forehead.
Bob Gardner
"Victor J. Osborne, Jr." wrote in message
...
No. Thank you for pointing out the obvious.
Folks we need t/b civil to each other. I was embarrassed recently when I
showed a friend how useful the info is on R.A.I. "Opps, never mind, he
has a problem w/ him." Oh, ya, They get a little off track sometimes."
Well, let me show the weather resources we have."
--
Thx, {|;-)
Victor J. (Jim) Osborne, Jr.
"Mitty" wrote in message
...
As of right now, 6 posts, none of which respond to the OP.
To clarify: I am asking the ATC guys a question. I am not interested in
readings from the FAR/AIM, other pilots' personal practices, OT advice,
or reading posts from people who are flaming each other. Thanks in
advance.
On 10/25/2005 10:39 AM, Mitty wrote the following:
Departing cross country out of the Minneapolis area in severe clear, I
will usually ask for either flight following or will file. I depart from
KMIC, which is under the 4000 foot shelf of the MSP bravo airspace.
For example, Friday I am going from KMIC to KGPZ, which is a couple
hundred miles to the north.
I am curious what TRACON and Center guys think:
Do you prefer to have me on a full IFR flight plan? (I always cancel
when I have the airport in sight if the destination is non-towered.)
Just advisories so you know who I am and what I am doing, but you don't
have to provide separation services?
Or do you not wish to hear at all? (Hopefully not, because I like being
in the system both for traffic info and in case of emergency.)
TIA
|