http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...300783_pf.html
"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
...
Robert M. Gary wrote:
In San Francisco the city is taking property away from a tire store to
give to a condo developer. Given our current state of liberal judges
nothing related taking private property suprises me.
-Robert
It was our CONSERVATIVE judges who stood in support of that piece
of socialism. The "liberals" led by Sandra Day O'Connor were
the ones who decided that BIG MONEY shouldn't be allowed to displace
the little guy on the "promise" of some future tax revenue.
You are sure misinformed. It was the liberal judges that supported that
descision. There is a ton of info about this on the web and it was all over
the news. Check out the above link. And yes, it fits the liberal adgenda.
The motivation is the amount of taxes that are generated by replacing a
small business or residence with a large business or multiple residences.
Ever wonder how many condos will fit on your airport? I encourage anyone who
questions how something like this can happen to research this particular
descision, how the justices voted, and what their poliical affiliation is.
Regarding the San Francisco tirestore---------
Just the amount of permit fees collected from the developer will probably
exceed tax revenue from the tire shop, and in that area, the city will force
the developer to improve or fund improvement to the surrounding city streets
as a condition of project approval. The motivation for the local govornment
are the taxes and fees generated.