"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Newps" wrote in message
news:sgTSb.153540$nt4.710088@attbi_s51...

You should refuse holding instructions without an EFC. Holding
instructions without an EFC constitutes an incomplete clearance.


Not in the US it doesn't.



I understood your citation of 7110.65 which showed that a clearance limit
short of the final destination did not have to include holding instructions
(nor an EFC), but I don't understand what situation would cause holding
instructions to be issued without an EFC. Please elaborate?

Thanks,
John Clonts
Temple, Texas
N7NZ