"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
..

The FAA counsel is also at odds with the regulation WRT 100 hour inspections
acording to Natalie.

I don't know where Tarver keep pulling this nonsense up. I never said that FAA
counsel was at odds. What I said is that certain A&P schools and other non
FAA types were at odds with the regulation. The regs and the FAA counnsel are clear
that rental without flight instruction do not require 100 hour inspections.

What I disagree with the FAA interpretations on is whether experimentals should be
banned from flight instruction for hire. The 100 hour rules have very specific
wording on flight instruction, the similar prohibition on carrying passengers for
hire is missing from the experimental rules. It merely says you can't use experimentals
for carrying passengers for hire.

It's clear if you search back in google, that Tarver seems to be off in a world of his
own when it comes to responding to anybody else's post. Why he's decided to
pick on me today is unclear.