In article t,
"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Ron Garret" wrote in message
...

Yes, I knew that actually. I see that subtlety is lost on you.


I see you're a poor judge of character.

I was not judging your character, I was stating an objectively
observable fact. Subtlety is, at least occasionally, lost on you (a
fact that you continue to demonstrate by failing to comprehend the point
that I am (subtly) making.)

You are mistaken.


I am completely correct.

When idiots say idiotic things do you think that they realize that they
are being idiots or do you think that they believe themselves to be
completely correct?

Really? How do you know that? I see no indication in the discussion
that Jose has changed his position. Have you been having an off-line
discussion with him? Or perhaps you are psychic?


Jose has a large ego and an aversion to admitting an error. If he could
show a hazard and thus prove me wrong he would do so.

Just because you lack the imagination to think of another possible
reason for Jose's reluctance to engage you in debate is not proof that
he is incapable of doing so.

Why would I want to do that?


To establish a bit of credibility in this forum.

My credibility would matter if I were attempting to make an argument
from authority, but I am not. I prefer to let facts speak for
themselves.

rg