View Single Post
  #7  
Old December 15th 05, 03:22 AM posted to rec.aviation.ifr
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flying through known or forecast icing

George,
I've been away for a few years, but when did forecast icing
become known icing without a pirep or physical indications on the
ground? If they are the same thing now days, why are aircraft certified
for "Flight in known icing (FIKI)" and not just flight in icing
conditions?


-----Original Message-----
From: George Patterson ]
Posted At: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:16 AM
Posted To: rec.aviation.ifr
Conversation: Flying through known or forecast icing
Subject: Flying through known or forecast icing

Bob Gardner wrote:
George, your heart is in the right place...but if you think that

someone
at
ATC has a pad of ticket forms just ready to write you up, you are

sadly
mistaken. I was told by an officer of the controller's union that
controllers are not interested in the certification status of an

airplane or
a pilot.


No, I don't think "they" are just waiting to write me up, but the OP

asked
if it
was *legal*, and it's not.

A former Assistant Administrator for Regulations and Certification

told
me
that it is the pilot who encounters icing conditions and makes no

attempt to
escape who would get a violation...but only if that failure resulted

in
an
accident/incident or required special handling by ATC. No one at a

Center
operating position knows if a pilot climbs or descends through a

cloud.

I've been told that too; however, I'm not going to go through clouds
without an
IFR clearance, and I wouldn't take either of the aircraft I've owned
through an
area in which icing has been reported. Now, if icing had only been
*forecast* in
that area but not reported, and the bottom of the cloud deck was well
above
minimums, I would chance it.

George Patterson
Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights

belong
to
your slightly older self.