On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:34:23 -0400, "Juan Jimenez"
wrote:

The BD-5D deposits are another story, I don't know what
happened to those. Nevertheless, the implication is that Jim Bede stole the
escrows. He did not. He came out of the bankruptcy damn near penniless. The
company may not have been managed as well as it should have, but there is
zero evidence anyone's money was stolen. It's that simple.

I don't understand. You say there is zero evidence that the money was
stolen, but it did get gone, right? Where did it go? If it
disappeared, isn't that prima faci evidence that "anyone's money was
stolen"?

Could it in fact be that simple?

Corky Scott