View Single Post
  #3  
Old December 21st 05, 04:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning,sci.electronics.design,alt.solar.photovoltaic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Wind/Solar Electrics ???

Tell us why anyone would modify a sine wave.

SolarFlare wrote:
Modified Semantic Wave is correct.

"George Ghio" wrote in message
...


wmbjk wrote:


I take that to mean that you won't be providing any


examples of sine

wave inverters with stepless waveforms. What a


shocker.

Wayne


Take it to mean that you can't prove that true sine


wave inverters don't

exist.

Modified Square Wave inverters = True

Modified Sine Wave inverters = False