"Peter Duniho" wrote
"Nick Danger" wrote in message
. ..
Sorry, that's a bunch of BS. If you expect to communicate clearly with
another person you must use words that you both know the meaning of, you
cannot use words that can be misinterpreted, unless you intend to
deceive
the other person right from the start.

You mean like saying things like "we know for a fact that Iraq has weapons
of mass destruction?"

Yes, exactly like that. Although in that particular case you might have a
problem proving that Bush outright lied - he may have been relying on some
pretty lousy intelligence information when he made that statement. Or, he
may have been lying.