wrote:

So far, only one side seems to be talking. I suspect that, as is usual
in these situations, Mr. Zink has been advised by his attorney not to
make public statements while the case is in progress. We've got lots
of opinions and virtually no verified facts.

In resorting to the legal system (a much over used ploy in Germany, if
what I have heard is correct) Herr Zink has denied himself the
opportunity to present his version of the story. That is his choice, and
we need not be limited by it. His actions are not the sort which should
arouse much sympathy.

We will never have the "facts" in the case. What we do have is a
plausible complaint from one party and no response from the other,
except for a lone apologist who, quite remarkably, urges _us_ to pay the
alleged damages. Disregarding that bit of lunacy, what we are left with
amounts to a simple "no contest" plea on the part of Herr Zink, perhaps
indicating a return to sanity.

We do look forward to receiving Herr Zink's version of the story.
Whether he comes out of his shell or not, the final, official decision
should be publicised here for all the world to see.


Jack