Not For Navigation would be on a file that is not updated on
the schedule. If the chart date is current, it doesn't
matter who or where it was printed.



--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

"Scott Draper" wrote in message
...
| it's clearly implied that one should NOT use such
"home-printed"
| plates in the cockpit.
|
| Given that there's no FAR requirement to use instrument
plates at all
| (current or not) for Part 91 ops, I see no legal
ramifications at
| all. Also, NACO itself publishes them on the web, which
is implicit
| endorsement for the use of home-printed charts.
|
| The "not for navigation" appears to be CYA.