"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
[...]
It would seem that this opens an avenue to legally
challenge that rational in an effort to modify/strike-down the
rule(s).

If that were true, why has no one contested any of the prior rule-making
changes that have similar lack of justification?

I doubt that there's any genuinely feasible way to engage a legal challenge
to the FAA's analysis. If there is, I'm all ears. We've got a ridiculous
*prohibited* area here in the Puget Sound that is just begging to be
overturned.

Pete