"Ray Andraka" wrote in message
...
I agree, an autopilot is a useful tool, which is why I added one to my
airplane. The need for one is, I think, also dependent on the airplane.
If
you've got an airplane that is a little squirrelly, you'll need an
autopilot
more than if you have one that handles more like a truck. I fly a
cherokee Six,
which is incredibly stable for IFR operations...that is to say that it
handles
like a sled...it takes a bit of effort to make it turn at all. Given the
stability of this airframe, an autopilot was not as high a priority as
some
other things. If it were a Tiger or Bonanza, I'm sure the importance
would have
carried more weight.
Tom Sixkiller wrote:
Under a situation of limited funds, one must weigh alternatives. This
article (from a autopilot manufacturer, so take what they say with a
grain
of salt) does make some damn good, well reasoned points (in the form of
a
decision tree at the end of the article).
www.s-tec.com/pdf/AutoPilotBook.pdf
And as you and the article state it should be only a TOOL, not a crutch. IN
a similar vein, it should be used like cruise control in a car; it should
not cause a deterioration in the ability to drive (and no, I'm not referring
to the Urban LegendŽ of the guy in the motor home that turned on cruise
control and went back to fix a sam'ich. ) :~)