Jim,

In particular Ed is trying to get Tim to explain why Tim thinks it is "technically illegal" to follow a
glideslope down to the glideslope intercept point instead of flying level at the glideslope intercept altitude.
I'm waiting for that explanation as well (though I suspect it was just some "sloppy" phraseology on Tim's
part).

--
Cheers,
John Clonts
Temple, Texas
N7NZ

"Jim Macklin" wrote in message newsPUCf.69835$QW2.2295@dukeread08...
I would try to monitor these groups 24/7 but sleep and other
tasks get in the way. Some posts get lost, some are
snipped, some don't include any of the previous post, sorry
if I post something that has been covered before.


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Bob Moore" wrote in message
. 122...
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
|
| If an altitude is underlined, it is the MINIMUM
altitude...
| if an altitude is over-lined it is the maximum altitude.
If
| it is both under and over-lined the altitude is
mandatory.
|
| Jim, you've really got to make a better attempt at keeping
up
| with these threads.
|
| Garner Miller posted this a few days back:
| 1800 is the minimum altitude; that's why it's underlined
only on the
| bottom of the number on the NACO charts. If it were
mandatory, it
| would have lines above and below (or the word "Mandatory"
on Jepp
| charts), and you would have to go down to 1800.
|
| Bob Moore