The Comanche line started with the 180, so the whole aircraft was
designed with the 180 hp engine in mind. A year or so later, the 250
came into existence. But the Lycoming O-540 is quite a bit heavier than
the O-320, so the 250 seems a little heavier in pitch, especially in the
landing flare. The 250 is really quite good, it is just that the 180 is
almost perfect.

I have only flown a 180 twice, but I could discern the difference from
my 250 that I have owned for over 20 years. The difference is slight,
but it is there.

The 180 is cheaper to own (lower initial cost, less gas, cheaper engine
overhaul), but you give up some payload and speed to save the money.
You will have to decide the relative worth yourself. I went for the
250, but I think the 180 has very slightly better handling. It all
depends on your mission profile.

Ask this question on the Delphi Forum and I am certain you will get a
number of differing viewpoints.

Hank
Henry A. Spellman
Comanche N5903P


RH wrote:
The Comanche 180 is probably the sweetest flying of the family, but the

Comanche 250 is the quintessential version.

That's an interesting comment. Can you elaborate on what it is you
like about the 180 over the other Comanches? Most of what I have read
so far online about the 180 says "go for the 250..." So any comments
specific to the 180 from someone who has flown one are greatly
appreciated!

Rich