"J. Severyn" wrote:
So you may have part of the numbers on your side, you did not
correctly model the problem, and therefore your conclusions are
probably incorrect. Go back and do the problem correctly.

I believe I adequately showed that the amount of water present in 20
gal. of air under extreme conditions is small, and that the amount that
would actually condense is smaller still. If you believe tank
respiration will substantially increase water condensed out of 20
gallons of air, why don't you provide calculations showing that?

--
Dan
C172RG at BFM