View Single Post
  #2  
Old February 9th 06, 04:49 AM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Consistent CAP over a fleet from a land base

In article ,
on Wed, 8 Feb 2006 09:36:54 -0000,
Keith W attempted to say .....


"Tank Fixer" wrote in message
k.net...
In article ,
on Tue, 7 Feb 2006 17:14:28 +0000 (UTC),
Taki Kogoma
attempted to say .....

On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 03:49:08 GMT,

allegedly declared to sci.military.naval...
In article .com,
on 6 Feb 2006 08:29:33 -0800,
Douglas Eagleson
attempted to say .....
A fighter specially designed for fleet defense was my comment.

You mean the F-14 then ....?

Nah. F-111...


Say, what was that straight wing predecessor of the F111 that didnt get
built ?


Douglas F6D Missileer


Duh, thanks, that's the one.

Isn't that just about what our boy is proposing ?


--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.