"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...
"Ted" wrote:


wrote...
Matt Barrow wrote:

Hmmm...how are they going to route traffic when all the VOR's are
decommissioned in the next few years?

Who told you that?

http://www.faa.gov/asd/gpstrans.pdf

http://avnwww.jccbi.gov/icasc/PDF/frp1999.pdf

http://www.alaska.faa.gov/capstone/d...de%20v1.1H.pdf

Don't use outdated FRPs.

Do you have a newer version?

The FAAs OLD thought of getting rid of all
ground-based navaids in favor of SATNAV was flawed from the beginning.
It was further reduced to outdated after 9/11.

How so?

The only issue (or flaw) that has come to my attention is the risk of radio
interference on the GPS civilian frequency. The replacement GPS satellites
are being designed with a second civilian frequency to address this problem.

http://www.dot.gov/affairs/1998/dot5598.htm

http://www.aero.org/news/newsitems/g...on-041398.html

http://geodesy.geology.ohio-state.ed...09/gpsfre.html

http://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/mail/igsma.../msg00316.html

http://clinton6.nara.gov/1998/03/199...an-signal.html