"Jose" wrote

Well, sorta. He didn't "admit it was" (or was intended to), he admitted
it could be taken thus. A little different. It casts shade on the
-other- statements he makes (which are slams) but I would not consider
it a slam in itself. In fact, as I point out, I consider it a positive
comment on the FAA.

Someone says something is dangerous, but legal, and you take that as a
positive comment - er, OK then. My guess is that you would be alone in that
interpretation.

BDS