In article .com,
wet the bed, took a drink from the toilet and
scrawled:

(snipped)

BACK ON TOPIC, I have no problem if the FAA demands the profits if the
airfield goes away. FAA made the investment after all. Furthermore,
this stance will help us keep airports active, and we need all the
tools we can get to counter these people that build/move next door to
airfields and then complain.

Its a matter of the highest and best use of the land, simple economics.


By that ass(umption), then let'$ $ell all the park$ and turn them over
to developer$ -- highe$t and be$t u$e of the land, after all!