The airline pilots wanted top be armed on Sept. 12, 2001.
Congress finally passed a law, but the TSA has dragged its
feet and only a handful are armed.
Why didn't the pilots just refuse to fly on Sept. 20 unless
they were armed. The answer, they are more afraid of the
government and the news media than they are of the
terrorists. The union, toothless, they only strike for more
money, not armed pilots and crews, not the rights of
citizens.
Government response...if pilots were armed, somebody on the
plane might get hurt, if the plane is hijacked we will shoot
it down with a missile from an F16 and kill them all.


--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"cjcampbell" wrote in
message
oups.com...
|
| Jose wrote:
| Eventually we will have to strike. No pilot flying any
kind of aircraft
| will fly into or out of one of these ADIZs until they
are removed.
|
| Isn't that what they want?
|
| The only way this could possibly work is if AIRLINE
pilots refused to go
| to any of the cities so restricted. When the airlines
can't fly there,
| people will notice.
|
| I said ALL pilots, including airline pilots. As I said,
scabs will have
| to be dealt with.
|