"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in
:
"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in
:
"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to
hundreds of people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the
government's version of events "defies physics". The Feb 1st
seminar can be viewed on Google Video, or downloaded to your
computer.
The following is a excerpt from Jones' PEER REVIEWED paper:
"I presented my objections to the "official" theory at a seminar at
BYU on September 22, 2005, to about sixty people. I also showed
evidence and scientific arguments for the controlled demolition
theory. In attendance were faculty from Physics, Mechanical
Engineering, Civil Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Psychology,
Geology, and Mathematics - and perhaps other departments as I did
not recognize all of the people present. A local university and
college were represented (BYU and Utah Valley State College).
The discussion was vigorous and lasted nearly two hours. It ended
only when a university class needed the room. After presenting the
material summarized here, including actually looking at and
discussing the collapses of WTC 7 and the Towers, only one attendee
disagreed (by hand- vote) that further investigation of the WTC
collapses was called for. The next day, the dissenting professor
said he had further thought about it and now agreed that more
investigation was needed."
Professor Jones now has dozens of people suporting him. His finding
are based on scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
In other words, you won't find any people using terms like kook,
tin foil hat, or any other childish terms. The people who
understand his scientific evidence are clear minded and not closed
asshole headed like a lot of people in this newsgroup seem to be.
You people are pathetic.
You stupid people don't know anything about anything when it comes
to 9/11.
The airplanes were flown by remote control. The events were for the
purpose of building public support to invade Afghanistan and Iraq.
Some of you will still deny this fact. If so, it will be because
your thinking process is too much filled with tin foil hat
commments, and you're too stupid and brainwashed to understand real
evidence
So when Atta come over the ATC frequency on accident instead of the
onboard PA that was just all computer controlled? What about the
people on the planes who said that they seen the hijackers enter the
cockpit while on the phones to their families? I guess all this
"data" doesn't fit into the grand conspiracy that you have cooked
up.
As I said before, the telephone calls were all faked, using new voice
synthesizer technology.
When was the last you called your mom and told her your last name?
"Mom, this is Mark Bingham"
http://www.thewebfairy.com/killtown/chart.html
The people on the other end sure seemed to be convinced they were
talking to their loved ones. Your "facts" are utter bull****. How
convenient that we have new voice synthesizer technology. The
government is to incompetent to do anything close to this magnitude.
----------------------------------------------
DW
Umm.. no they weren't. Some of them stated that they did not act like
their loved ones. The government version of 9/11 is utter bull****. There
are no facts to back them up.
Here are some 9/11 FACTS. They are indisputable. You disagree? Prove it.
Believe me, you won't be able to.
FACT: Never before in world history has a steel framed building
completely collapsed from fire. Not before 9/11, not after 9/11.
Never!
No building has ever had a terrorist fly a completely loaded B757 into it
either.
FACT: WTC 7 was ***NOT*** hit by an airplane!
Falling debris took that down.
FACT: WTC 7 collapsed from "fire and debris", according to the government
Good call.
FACT: The WTC 7 collapse mimicked controlled demolition, as did the
Towers. They all collapsed almost symmetrically, near free fall speed,
into their own footprints.
It fell after the damage finally took its toll, big whoop.
FACT: There were small puffs of smoke (known as squibs) coming out of
all three buildings, a sign of controlled demolitions.
That is the levels pancaking on top of one another, the building didn't
simply "fall over".
FACT: Explosives expert Van Romero said just days after 9/11 that he
could tell all three buildings collapsed from controlled demolition just
by watching the video footage
There are plenty of "experts" that are wrong.
FACT: Romero recanted just a few days later without giving any scientific
explanation as to why. He was then promoted.
And.....
FACT: WTC 7 leaseholder Larry Silverstein bought a 99 yr lease on the
entire WTC complex just six weeks before 9/11, which just happened to
include terrorist attack insurance
That was not the first time the WTC had been terrorist attacked, DUH!
FACT: The structural engineer that worked for Silverstein's insurance
company told the Discovery Channel that the Towers' massive vertical
columns all failed simultaneously, and mimicked controlled demolition
Mimicked doesn't mean is.
FACT: Silverstein said WTC7 was "pulled" on a PBS documentary
They decided to not try and save it, once again big whoop.
FACT: In that same documentary, a construction worker used the word
"pull" as slang for "professionally demolish"
See above.
FACT: The WTC7 fire alarm was put into "test mode" the morning of 9/11
And this could of been standard issue or bad timing, happens every day.
FACT: Silverstein was absent from his 88th floor office in the North
Tower on the morning of 9/11 due to a "doctors appointment"
Oh my god he went to the doctor???!
FACT: Over a hundred witnesses have made statements of explosions
All sorts of **** was going crazy, eyewitness testimony is notoriously
BOGUS.
FACT: The FBI was going under the assumption that bombs were in the
buildings.
As well they should in any kind of terrorist incident.
FACT: The FDNY Chief Of Safely told an NBC reporter there might be a
secondary device in the building
MIGHT doesn't mean WAS.
FACT: FDNY personnel (including Fire Commissioners, Fire Marshals,
Captains, and Lieutenants) reported flashes, bombs, and explosions
that they compared to controlled demolitions.
Once again it doesn't prove ****.
FACT: Many of the FDNY personnel above stated that controlled demolition
was their gut instinct.
See above. Experts are wrong a lot.
FACT: The NIST investigators made the assumption that collapse initiation
would "inevitably" lead to global collapse, despite the fact that it
never happened before in world history.
When 30% of the upper part of a high rise building has tons of JetA on fire
as well as office equipment and more on fire it is no wonder that the
buildings couldn't take that weight and structual damage.
FACT: The NIST investigators performed little analysis of the structural
behavior of the Towers following collapse initiation
The building fell down and the reason was pretty ****ing easy to see, fully
loaded jets heading aross the country full of Jet A hit the building at high
speed and exploded. Doesn't take a rocket scientist.
FACT: The NIST investigators altered the data for their computer
simulations
Says the conspiracy nut....
FACT: The NIST investigators refuse to show their computer simulation
model despite calls from leading structural and fire engineers.
Bull****.