TRUTH wrote:
"Frank F. Matthews" wrote in
:



TRUTH wrote:


Jones does not need to be a building engineer. He's a physicist and
is therefore qualified to determine if the government's version
defies physics. And since his paper, and the 150 people in st911.org,
use science, and not kooky proofless boxcutter nonsense, they can see
that the WTC was taken down by controled demolitions. So can anyone
else who looks at the information I posted.


Not really. He is lately an expert in Cold Fusion and Christ's visit
to America.

His arguments are not particularly plausible or convincing.

His arguments are based on scientific principles. They do not have to be
convincing, since scientific laws cannot be changed, such as the Law of
Increasing Entropy. Are you an engineer or physicist?

Mathematics but I have a pretty good background in Physics.

How do explain THREE collapses at near free fall speed? First time in
history from fire!


Two very large airplanes into buildings do have an effect.

Where did the energy come from to pulvarize concrete and office furniture
into particles of fine powder?

Lots of kinetic and thermal energy.

Where did the force come to *evaporate* steel?

Why was there moltel metal and yellow-hot metal under the Towers (AND
BUILDING 7) weeks after 9/11? (Those colors are consistant with thermite
explosives.)

As I said lots of energy available.

Also, why did the government hall away and destroy the evidence before it
could be properly analyzed?

There was some interest in trying to clean up the area. Should they
have closed off a fair part of the island for a couple of years. As I
said the man is not an expert in anything that connects and his claims
are neither plausible or convincing.