Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONSon 9/11
TRUTH wrote:
His arguments are based on scientific principles. They do not have to be
convincing,
Then forgive us for not being convinced.
since scientific laws cannot be changed, such as the Law of
Increasing Entropy.
Entropy applies here how?
Are you an engineer or physicist?
How do explain THREE collapses at near free fall speed? First time in
history from fire!
There weren't any collapses at near free fall speed. They were
considerably slower.
Where did the energy come from to pulvarize concrete and office furniture
into particles of fine powder?
The mass of the floors above. The formula is F = MA. Look it up.
Where did the force come to *evaporate* steel?
Heat alone can do that. Metal DOES boil and become a gas at high
enough temperatures.
Why was there moltel metal and yellow-hot metal under the Towers (AND
BUILDING 7) weeks after 9/11? (Those colors are consistant with thermite
explosives.)
Wrong again, I have used thermite and it burns white hot and not for
weeks. Thermite burns at too slow a rate to be used for demolition of
tall buildings. There were fires from broken gas lines. Yellow hot steel
is no where near "molten."
Also, why did the government hall away and destroy the evidence before it
could be properly analyzed?
I assume you mean "haul," now prove they did.
Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
|