TRUTH wrote:


Totally illogical reasoning. Your statements are not scientific. There
are dozens of things you are not taking into consideration.

You keep using the word "scientific" without any apparent
understanding of its meaning. Why do you keep demanding "scientific
proof" when you don't even understand the science in Jones' paper? You
said so yourself.



If you actually believe the government's nonsense, you should have no
problem explaining WHY Jones' evidence does not apply. Go read his
paper.. A PAPER BASED ON SCIENCE, and debunk his statements.

It's been done several times, but you don't understand it any more
than you understand Jones.

It's only
the crackpots who believe absurd ideas when all the scientific evidence
shows otherwise.

Jones is hardly "all the scientific evidence," he's just the one you
choose to believe. When someone provides an FE you say it's not
scientific. FEA is scientific in that the results are reproducible, fit
the known laws of science and have passed peer review. The fact you
don't understand FEA doesn't make it nonscientific.

Prove yourself to be normal. Take the time and go
through his paper. Here's the URL

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html


I have and I disagree with his findings. I won't explain why because
you won't understand, you will accuse me of being "unscientific" or
simply dismiss my responses out of hand.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired