"tim gueguen" wrote in message
news:spbLf.62814$sa3.17705@pd7tw1no...

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Tenured Physics Professor Steven E Jones gave two seminars to hundreds
of
people on WTC controlled demolitions and how the government's version of
events "defies physics".

If you're gonna promote conspiracy theories why not promote credible ones?
A much more believeable theory would be that the 911 attacks took place as
anyone with sense believes, with hijacked airliners flying into the World
Trade Center and the Pentagon, but that Osama bin Laden is actually a CIA
operative, and the creation of al Qaeda and its terrorist activities were
all at the behest of the Company. Of course you'd still have to come up
with some halfways believeable theory about why the CIA wanted bin Laden
to
do all this stuff, but at least the method would be credible. Instead we
get ludicrous fantasies about robot planes and demolition charges somehow
planted in the WTC with no one noticing them.

The why is simple: to give the US an excuse to grab Iraq's oil so we can
have cheap gas, at least according to those who believe that theory.

I'm leaning towards the idea that a more plausible why was to give the US an
excuse to start a war in the Middle East which would invariably increase the
price of oil and thus gas which would directly benefit all those who stood
to gain by such an action. The fact that Bush gets on the television and
says "don't worry, be happy" is further proof he is in a different orbit
than most of the rest of us.

I have no idea why the peace mongers would think it was to get cheap oil -
that's just crazy talk.

Paul Nixon