Peter Duniho wrote:

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

View them side by side and then you'll see my definition of decent. There
is simply no comparison. If you want to see fine detail in scenery,
instruments, etc., you won't be happy on a white painted wall.


I'm not talking about a white painted wall. I'm talking about a nice,
budget-priced screen. In any case, if the best you can come up with for a
definition of "decent" is "the difference between a $1000 screen and a $300
screen", then you haven't proven anything. You've simply chosen to define
"decent" in a way that tautologically "proves" your point.

I didn't even try to define it. I suggested how you could know it when
you see it. If you are happy with a cheap projector on a cheap screen,
then what is your problem with me not being happy with it? My standards
are simply higher than yours. Not a problem for me, and I'm not sure
why it bothers you so much.


Matt