View Single Post
  #110  
Old February 27th 06, 10:12 PM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

TRUTH wrote:
mrtravel wrote in
. com:

TRUTH wrote:
Let me clarify... Regardless of its effect on the fire, the point is
that it was placed in test mode *on the morning of 9/11*.

So? If there was no effect, then what difference does it make.
On the morning of 9/11, I suspect the firemen were more concerned with
WTC 1 and 2. If explosives were used to bring down WTC 1,2, and 7,
what difference would turning off the fire alarm make?




The point is why would they put the alarm in test mode, on 9/11?


Perhaps they had been getting false readings, perhaps it was an
accident, who knows. Not every thing done that day had nefarious intent.
I will give you an example from reality. In the mid 1980s the new fire
alarm system in my hangar had a tendency to go off on hot days for no
reason. We would all run and push the helicopters out to a safe distance
manually, the fire department would send equipment and there was no
fire. After a week of this the base fire chief had us turn the alarm off
whenever the hangar during the hotter times of the day. See? There are
valid reasons.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired