View Single Post
  #5  
Old March 1st 06, 08:37 AM posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Scholars for 9/11 Truth -- HTTP://ST911.ORG -- REPLY IN THISTHREAD ONLY FOR THE MORON

TRUTH wrote:

These are the best links for Pentagon information:


http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/background.html
(Click on the links next to the word "background" at the top)


This describes the Pentagon background and has nothing to do with the attack


http://911review.com/attack/pentagon/index.html


A lot of supposition on this site.
Wow, believe it or not, a former military pilot was in control (what are
the odds that military fighter pilots end up on an airline):

"The pilot of Flight 77 was Chic Burlingame, a graduate of the U.S.
Naval Academy who flew F-4s for the U.S. Navy in Vietnam. According to
Col. Donn de Grand Pr‚, would-be hijackers had no chance of seizing
control of the plane from this experienced veteran. Such a pilot could
have easily disabled any would-be hijackers by simply rolling the plane"

Various reports have indicated the vulnerability of a seated and
strapped in pilot. "Simply rolling the plane"? How often is this done in
the 757 simulator?




I had originally recommended this site:
http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html

however... the OilEmpire site believes it bad to promote theories that
could be debunked,


That isn't what that page says, does it?
It actually says these stupid theories are made up to make the truth
people look bad. Are you in this group?

It also states, regarding the "truth people": "a few appear to be
promoting nonsense deliberately."


People have a hard time understanding 9/11 because of cognitive
dissonance. Fortunately people are waking up.

I have given enough information and links over the past week for those
intererested to look into it deeper.


Have you actually read these websites?