March 5th 06, 01:39 AM
posted to rec.travel.air,alt.disasters.aviation,rec.aviation.piloting,rec.aviation.military
|
|
|
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible
"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Pooh Bear wrote in
:
TRUTH wrote:
How many times do you need to have it explained to you that
there
was
no need for any of them to be instrument trained ? Flying in
clear skies does not require an instrument rating.
Graham
At 30,000 feet it does
No. Take it from the experts. They are here in this group. The only
purpos of an instrument rating on a clear day at 30,000 feet is to
be legal. A terrorist couldn't care less.
Okay, I admit I don't have the qualifications for this. What I do
know is what an aeronautical engineer has said. (He's also qualified
to fly large aircralf.) I consider him an expert.
Can I please direct you here ? ( the federal aviation regulations )
http://www.gofir.com/fars/part125/
Perhaps you would be good enough to finally acknowledge that an
instrument rating is not a necessity just to simply fly a large
aircraft ?
Graham
Thanks Graham, I bookmarked that link. Will take a look later on
How about looking at it NOW before you continue to make a ****ing ass of
yourself?
|