On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 01:39:26 GMT, "Wake Up!" wrote:

There is NO concrete evidence (at this time) that it was thermite.

Jones' paper is a hypothesis. See here if not familiar:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hypothesis

The evidence he shows suggests controlled demolitions. The purpose of his
paper is to call for a new investigation.
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takea...ltl=1141667399

So lets sum this up, shall we?

Jones is calling for a new investigation, not on the basis of any concrete
evidence, but entirely on his dislike of the original investigation.

What makes Jones think he's entitled to use my money to fund his own private
investigation?