Thanks.

Tim.

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 20:05:29 -0400, Ron Rosenfeld
wrote:

On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:29:05 -0600, Tim Auckland wrote:

Another question about this approach (and I've seen similar apparent
ommisions on other approaches):

Why isn't the initial approach segment from PAWLING marked "NoPT"?

To me, it makes no more sense to do a PT when coming in over PAWLING
than it does when coming in over KINGSTON, yet the KINGSTON IAS is
marked "NoPT", and the PAWLING one isn't.

Is this just a charting error, or is there a subtlety that I'm
missing?

On my Jepp chart dtd 5/21/2004, the segment from PWL IS marked NoPT. So
probably the NACO chart is incorrect.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)