"Greg Farris" wrote in message
...
In article ,

says...

I didn't write any of the text found in your post. Why did you include an
attribution?

Tripods and exposure times are only half the issue.

No doubt. That's why I wrote in a previous post: "there's more to getting a
great photograph than simply getting a sufficient exposure".

In most indoor aviation exhibits distances are too short for much
photography,
and there are often other planes in the way. I did some work at the
Duxford
museum in England - often working alone at night, just to go to the toilet
I
literally had to walk around a B17 and under a Vulcan bomber! No way to
get any pictures there though, because of the way the planes are crammed
into the
hangar.

"In most"? How did you arrive at that conclusion? Most of the aviation
exhibits I've been do don't involve cramming as many airplanes as possible
into a space. Sure, it's often not possible to take a picture of just one
airplane at a time, but to say you can't photograph most indoor aviation
exhibits is just plain wrong. It just takes some creativity and a good eye
for the composition.

Pete