Recently, Chris W posted:

Tom Conner wrote:

In the age of digital photography, and computer generated graphics,
no picture by itself can be believed. However, if eye witnesses
back up the picture then its accuracy becomes more reliable. Of
course, a good paranoid conspiracy believer will know that the eye
witnesses are really part of the clever diabolical plot by the
government to hide the truth.


I have to agree, there is nothing that will convince the conspiracy
morons. All the going to court to have this video released was just a
wast of time and money.

I don't think so. There are other issues involved; for example, the
struggle between those that want to make everything a secret vs. those
that feel that information should be readily available if not to everyone,
then at least to appointed officials. I also don't quite understand the
Pentagon's publilcly stated reason for *not* releasing the various videos
of the incident.

Neil