"Bob Noel" wrote in message
...
In article 1Z4bg.174799$WI1.109727@pd7tw2no, "Private"

wrote:

In this issue there seems to be too many 'experts' refusing to answer
valid
questions. These 'experts' attempt to use bluster and attacks on
character
as a substitute for reason. IMHO many are afraid that at least some of
the
answers may be uncomfortable to prior belief and force the reevaluation
of
core values.
[snipperoo]
The very use of the term 'conspiracy theorists' to denigrate those who
dare
to question the 'approved' 'conspiracy theory of 19 Arabs with box
cutters
is an attempt to discredit by attack on character to avoid talking about
truth which in this as in all wars is the first casualty.

like the use of term "experts"?


touché - valid point