"Paul J. Adam" wrote:

In message , Fred J. McCall
writes
"Paul J. Adam" wrote:
:So, we are that a helicopter can effectively engage a low slow flier,
:correct?

For some definition of "effectively", "low" and "slow".

Thank you.

snip

Gentlemen, those of us who've more or less followed the 'discussion' to this
point have, I think, long since reached our conclusions about which of your
positions is more likely correct, as well as which of you is behaving in a
more honest, forthright and objective manner. Repetition ad ad ad nauseum of
the same points serves no useful purpose. Just to make my position perfectly
clear,

'E's not pinin'! 'E's passed on! This parrot is no more! He has ceased to be!
'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! 'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e
rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed 'im to the perch 'e'd be pushing up the
daisies! 'Is metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's
kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, rung down the curtain
and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!! THIS IS AN EX-PARROT!!

If either/both of you still finds amusement in continuing this exchange, well
and good, but I imagine the rest of us find it increasingly tedious. FWIW,
may I suggest that each of you call a halt, and take away from it the
certainty of the rightness of your position and its support/ approbation of
some percentage of your audience; for yourselves, such percentage to be
determined solely in your own minds, plus whatever public/private indications
you may receive.

Good day.

Guy