My post was meant as tongue-in-cheek (somewhat). Nobody need be
subservient to GA, but just as you take every opportunity to trash
Boyer and AOPA on this forum (ad nauseum) I can use your same absurd
brand of logic to argue that the FAA should, in the interest of
promoting aviation safety, make more of an effort to restrict
developers from encroaching on airports (large & small) thus
endangering building occupants.

Skylune wrote:

Of course you are correct, as always. All development, populuation
growth, etc. must be absolutely subservient to the needs of GA.