In article ,
"Peter Duniho" wrote:

None of which supports your orginal thesis or even validates your
approach.

What approach?

Your approach of trying to make a claim/proof/whatever about pilots as
drivers based on aircraft accident rates without any basis for a relationship
between the two.


You and Jose seem to be under the misimpression that I'm trying to prove
something here.

You attempted to make *something*.

You attack my statements on that basis

No. I disagreed with your argument based on its flaws. Not on you
or your intent.

, when in fact you
are completely wrong about my intent. Your argumentative replies are
irrelevant.

your intent is irrelevant. My intent is irrelevant.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate