
June 15th 06, 06:48 PM
posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
|
|
Why don't wings have dimples?
This supersonic prop project produced some strange results...
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...s/q0031b.shtml
http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/annex/an48.htm
http://www.1000aircraftphotos.com/Postcards/818.htm
JP
kirjoitti
glegroups.com...
Peter Dohm wrote:
...
Well, I already know a lot of the rules of thumb for drag reduction,
especially with laminar flow, and that is my first choice for choosing or
building an airplane.
I am also interested in general aerodynamics, and am somewhat intrigued
by
the issue of dimples. Particularly, grooves and dimples could be quite
interesting as related to propellers. Regrettably, there is a /very/
finite
limit to the percentage of time I can devote to that, so my progress may
be
gradual.
Check with the powered paraglider people. I've been told that
some of their props have a groove running along the crowned
face of the blade.
A prop is just a wing rotating rapidly around the wing root. But the
effective airspeed of a prop appproaches Mach 1, where compressibility
becomes important.
A supersonic prop would be interesting....
--
FF
|