Notes like this are not regulatory, they're just reminders.

I suppose this would be true, as the actual regulations are in part
something-or-other, and it is not required that one even have the chart,
just the textual description of the approach. Nonetheless, I would
expect pilots not to second-guess government publications in that
manner; after all part something-or-other might also have a misprint.

If it is an error, it should be NOTAM'd until it is reprinted. Absent a
NOTAM, I would expect pilots to rely on the government publication that
contained the putative error.

Jose
--
The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.