Thread: Flare vs flair
View Single Post
  #2  
Old June 26th 06, 09:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Flare vs flair

Orval Fairbairn wrote in newsrfairbairn-
:

In article ,
"Quilljar" wrote:

Or "its" for "it's" or "there" for "their" or "they're". Or "height"
for "altitude". Or "think" for "believe". Or "Web" for "Internet".
Or "insane eccentricity" for "precision".

- Andrew



Actually, more people use it's when they mean its (possessive) :-)


I think that a lot of the problem arises from the proliferation of voice
recognition technology and the failure to proofread.


I'll agree to that one. I peruse several science related
news web sites and I have been seeing an alarming amount
of typographical and grammatical errors. Some I can readily
tell are caused by errors in electronically scanning printed
text. The rest could be explained by what you propose, voice
recognition.

In all cases, there is a definate lack of proofreading among
these 'professional' writers. I thought they went to school?

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?