Yup. Real straightforward as far as I'm concerned:

A manufacturer's statement
is acceptable due to neither the Civil
Aeronautics Administration (CAA) nor the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) having
published an FAA fire standard for either flash
or flame resistance for interior materials for
CAR-3 aircraft.

I believe that in my original post I mentioned that if you were truly
concerned about the legality of the institutional materials
(flash/flame resistant) used, save a piece of the material with the
stamp on the back.

It would be a totally different ball game if you were trying to buy
interior "parts" instead of performing a re-rag, or if you were talking
about a non-CAR3 aircraft.

TC


Newps wrote:
wrote:


Find me a CAR3 or for that matter a CFR14/PT91 or 43 reference to
interior re-furb materials & workmanship applicable to a 60's vintage
PA28.

Would not AC 43.13-1b, ch 9-61 not apply? Seems pretty straightforward
to me.

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/99c827db9baac81b86256b4500596c4e/$FILE/Chapter%2009-10.pdf