Matt Giwer wrote:
Dan wrote:

Jordan wrote:

Matt Giwer wrote:

He threw rocks at a tank. ELEVEN days later he was murdered by a
sniper.

He was killed BECAUSE it was caught on film and he was on his
way to becoming a
role model. So he was murdered in cold blood.


Seems to me that when someone chooses to be a combatant in a war, one
cannot complain if one's chosen enemy decides to shoot back at you --
whether immediately or a bit later. Sniping at enemy combatants is
quite legal under any version of the Laws of War.


Ah I see so the soloution to some rioting teenagers in LA or New York,
is call out the National Gaurd and shoot them all, or is that only OK
if they are Muslim?

So the reason the UK put up with terrorism for 30 years is we did not
"do the right thing" which was obviously implement operation "Peace for
Ulster", invade Republic of Ireland, put Dublin under siege and destroy
with Heavy Artillary for 95 days, then send RAF to to destroy the
fundraising capitals of the terrorists, New York and Boston.


Or as an Irish friend once said, If the Irish had the political
power of the Jews, America would have bombed London by now.

Was that an Irish person or an American claiming to be Irish? There is a
vast difference, as those of us who live and work with the Irish know.

Ricardo

--
"Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand
Ignorance and prejudice, and fear, walk hand in hand ..."