I like to top post, it is called


--
James H. Macklin
ATP,CFI,A&P

--
The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
some support
http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm
See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties.


"Tom Conner" wrote in message
ink.net...
|
| "Crash Lander" wrote in message
| ...
| It only has to happen once for a tragedy to occur.
No-one
| checked the soles of your shoes for explosives until
someone
| tried to blow up something with explosives in their
shoes
| either. A perfect example of not bothering with it until
a
| tragedy occurs. When someone takes some pics of a plane,
and
| those pics are found in the apartment of someone who's
just
| blown themselves and your best mate up with that same
plane
| somewhere down your street, will you be complaining why
nobody
| did anything when they saw him taking the pictures at
your
| local aerodrome? I'm with Dudley on this one.
| Crash Lander
|
| --
| I'm not always right,
| But I'm never wrong!
|
| First, don't top post. It screws up the readability of
the thread. Second,
| your logic is some of the worst ever posted on Usenet, so
it is pretty bad.
| Just because something has not happened is not an excuse
to have
| over-the-top, ridiculous, paranoid,
government-is-always-right security
| procedures. If that is what you want then move to some
authoritarian
| country. Quit trying to turn this country into some slave
state.
| Personally, I am fed up with the current culture of
stupidity that has taken
| over this country. It doesn't matter whether it is global
warming,
| religion, Iraq, taxes, security or stem cells. The
stupidity has to stop.
|
|
| "Thomas Borchert" wrote in
message
| ...
| Dudley,
|
| People who are taking pictures at airports
unfortunately are now a
| security
| issue.
|
|
| One example where the taking of pictures led directly
to a security
| breach.
| Just one. Thanks.
|
| --
| Thomas Borchert (EDDH)
|
|
|
|
|