In article , Todd Pattist
writes:


That you don't have a clue about what you are saying.

If you can't explain your point and can't provide any
support for it, you're not going to convince anyone.
Computer software is not subject to design patent
protection. Aircraft designs are. Software is not normally
provided to customers in human readable format (it's source
code). Aircraft building plans are human readable. Software
is freely transferrable to another user for reuse. You
allege that aircraft plans have contract language that
forbids this.


Wrong on all points.

I ask again why you think computer software shrink-wrap
licenses are similar to the contract language you say is
found on most aircraft plans.
Todd Pattist
(Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.)
___
Make a commitment to learn something from every flight.
Share what you learn.



Go back and read the post that I responded to you lame brain idiot. I don't
have time to try to teach you what you clearly don't want to learn.


Bob Reed
www.kisbuild.r-a-reed-assoc.com (KIS Builders Site)
KIS Cruiser in progress...Slow but steady progress....

"Ladies and Gentlemen, take my advice,
pull down your pants and Slide on the Ice!"
(M.A.S.H. Sidney Freedman)