On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:39:05 GMT, 588 wrote in
::

Larry Dighera wrote:


...failing to acknowledge the
culpability of the military in each of the military/civil MAC NTSB
reports I cited, is tacit agreement that each was the fault of the
military flight.


Failing to acknowledge culpability is the same as admitting fault,
in your world?


Deliberately failing to even read the NTSB reports of military/civil
MACs shows a fear of facing the facts. If one fears facing facts, he
has tacitly implied he is uncomfortable acknowledging the truth, and
thus implied he believes the military culpable.

The truth is, that the military pilots in those MACs:

1. Collided with a glider that had the right of way.

2. Violated regulations resulting in the death of a civil pilot.

3. Failed to see-and-avoid a crop duster while operating on a MTR
beyond the active time period submitted to the FAA.

4. Collided with a civil aircraft approaching from the right, and
thus had the right-of-way.

Given those facts, as contained in the NTSB reports, it's easy to see
why Mr. Rasimus shied away from informing himself about them.

You can attempt to discredit me personally by deliberately
misinterpreting my words, but you will not be successful if you fail
to discuss the issues I have raised. So far you haven't even
attempted to do that in good faith. I think that says a lot more
about your honesty and integrity than I could ever manage.