"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Richard Hertz" no one@no one.com wrote in message
. net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...
And what paranoid thoughts were those? I can't see anything in my
posts
that qualifies as paranoia. You choose to project some mistaken
beliefs
in
my reasons for owning firearms.

http://www.heretical.com/sexsci/bpsychol.html



WTF is this all about?
or as the canadans say, "aboot?"


Ummm...about psychology?

And why was it posted?

Let's see: we're talking the psychology of gun owners and anti-gunners...

I was accused of being paranoid and asked for a reason why Cecil thought so.
You posted a copy of a web page.



I asked for a reason why Cecil called me paranoid and you posted a book.

Well, why don't you see if there is something on TV that can define the
issue in terms your limited attention span can comprehend.

I watch about 2 hours per month, nice try though. I was expecting to see a
post that was relevant to what I had asked, not some regurgitation of
something that had no bearing on my post, though I did see that projection
was mentioned and i can only attribute that to Cecil and his ideas about gun
owners.

BTW, it seems the "book" (which you DIDN'T HAVE TO READ) hit a sore spot
with you. Did you see yourself defined?

No sore spot, just wondering why it was presented. I asked about paranoia
and was responded to with Freudian nonsense. I also see no neurosis in my
behavior, though will admit that you may not think I can be objective on
this point. Owning firearms and stating so does not make one paranoid or
neurotic, in spite of what the gun control crowd will have people believe.