C. Massey schrieb:

OK... But what I don't understand is why would they have two runways that
are the same surface width, but it is listed as a 75 ft runway they way it
is marked? It seems to me that if they are the same surface width, they
would mark both of them the same usable width.

Look again at the Google image. The surface of rwy 26 is in a poor
state. Maybe it's even poorer outside the markings. And before you ask
why it is not better maintained: It costs money.

Stefan